We don't automate documented processes.
We transform real processes.
We leverage bleeding-edge AI models and years of experience. See how businesses are optimizing critical legacy processes and transforming the value they create.
Filter by department
From 30 recorded calls to a structured product brief. Without anyone pressing play.
Recorded customer interviews turned into structured product insights.
The product team runs 30 customer calls. Today, those recordings sit in a folder until someone finds time to listen. This agent processes every call, extracts quotes by theme, maps what customers are asking for against the current roadmap — and calls out the gaps no one planned to solve. The output lands directly in the product management tool as tagged, prioritized notes. PMs open their existing workflow and the research is already there, structured and actionable.
- 30 calls processed. Zero hours of listening. Every insight mapped against the actual roadmap — gaps the team didn’t know existed, surfaced before the next sprint planning.
- Open the product management tool on Monday morning and the research is already there. Tagged, prioritized, linked to source clips. Like a research team that works weekends.
An 800-page RFP lands Friday. By Monday, there’s a draft. Proven language pulled, gaps marked, compliance matrix built.
Large-scale RFPs turned into submission-ready proposals with proven language.
An 800-page RFP lands on a Friday. The agent reads every section, extracts every requirement, and checks each against past proposals and the knowledge base. Where a requirement matches something that’s been won before, the proven language is reused. Where it doesn’t, it flags the gap so writers focus where it matters. Forms are pre-filled, licence checklists prepared. Before submission, the agent rebuilds the compliance matrix against the final draft — every requirement addressed, nothing lost in edits.
- A requirement the firm has won on before? The proven language is already in the draft. A requirement never seen before? It’s flagged so writers spend time where it matters — not on boilerplate.
- The compliance matrix isn’t a one-time check. It’s rebuilt against the final draft, after all the edits, right before submission. Nothing slips through.
A week’s worth of permit applications reviewed, sorted, and code-checked before lunch.
Permit applications pre-processed into a compliant review queue.
A planning department receives 80–120 applications a week. The agent reads each one, cross-references the current building code, zoning ordinance, and project description, and sorts them: complete applications go to the approval queue with a summary; incomplete ones get a deficiency notice citing the exact code section and what’s missing. Reviewers start from a queue of actionable files, not a stack of paper.
- A new ordinance takes effect Tuesday. By Wednesday, every application is already reviewed against it. No one updated a checklist. No one sent a memo.
- Applicants who get a specific deficiency notice fix the right thing and resubmit once. The ones who get a vague rejection? Three resubmissions, two phone calls, and a complaint to the council.
Monday morning. The ops report is already in the channel. Four-week trends included. Nobody touched a spreadsheet.
Multi-source performance data compiled into a trend-aware weekly report.
Every Monday, the ops team needs a performance report combining data from the ERP, CRM, and logistics systems. Someone pulls the files, merges them, applies the business logic, formats the output, and sends it before the standup. The agent does all of it — connecting to each source, running the calculations, and delivering a report that compares this week to the prior four and flags anything outside the threshold. It’s posted to the team channel before anyone asks. If a data source is down, the gap is noted — not silently omitted.
- A 3% dip is noise. A 3% dip for four consecutive weeks is a trend the team would have caught in month-end review — six weeks too late. The agent flags it now.
- A data source is down? The report says so. Silently dropping a column is how reporting loses the trust it took months to build.
Five proposals in five formats walk in. A single normalized comparison matrix walks out. Risk clauses included.
Mismatched vendor proposals normalized into a scored comparison matrix.
Five vendors submitted five different ways: a slide deck, a technical spec, a pricing sheet. The agent reads all five, normalizes pricing to a common unit — per seat per month, fully loaded — and builds a single comparison matrix covering capabilities, SLAs, and support tiers. It also flags risk terms buried in the fine print: auto-renewal clauses, liability caps, data ownership provisions. The procurement team adds relationship context. The recommendation brief lands in the team channel, ready for review.
- One vendor sent a 12-slide deck. Another sent an 80-page spec. A third sent a pricing sheet in an email. By morning, all five are normalized — per seat, per month, fully loaded — in a single matrix.
- Auto-renewal clauses. Liability caps. Data ownership terms buried on page 47. The fine print the team doesn’t always have time to read carefully? Flagged and summarized.
The adjuster opens a clean file. Contradictions flagged, determination drafted, jurisdiction compliance already verified.
Claims intake through determination letter, compliance-checked by jurisdiction.
A claim comes in. The agent reads the form, the policy, and every supporting document — photos, estimates, weather records. It maps each element to the relevant clauses and drafts the determination. Contradictions — a repair estimate dated before the incident, photo metadata that doesn’t match the timeline — are flagged before the adjuster touches the file. The adjuster makes the judgment calls. The agent writes the letter and validates it against the regulatory requirements for the filing jurisdiction.
- A repair estimate dated before the reported incident. Photo metadata from a different city. The agent catches the contradiction before the adjuster even opens the file.
- Compliance rules change by jurisdiction. Response timelines, disclosure requirements, appeal language — all adapted automatically. No one looks up the regulation.
Day one. Access provisioned, forms filled, training queued. HR didn’t coordinate any of it.
New hires fully provisioned with role-specific access and forms on day one.
A new engineer joins Monday. The agent builds the full onboarding packet from the handbook, benefits catalog, IT checklist, and org chart — pre-populating every form and generating a role-specific setup list: source control access, VPN credentials, dev environment, security training. HR assigns the buddy. The agent tracks every outstanding signature and overdue item daily until the file is complete.
- Engineering hire: source control access, VPN, dev environment, security training. Sales hire: CRM, phone line, demo environment. The setup list is built from the role — not pulled from a generic template.
- No one in HR chases signatures. Every outstanding item is flagged with who owns it, every day, until it’s done. Like a project manager who never forgets and never nags.
Every invoice matched against PO, contract, and policy. Clean ones approved. Flagged ones come with the exact clause, not just a yellow highlight.
Invoices matched, approved or flagged with the exact policy clause.
The agent matches every invoice against the purchase order, service agreement, and expense policy before it reaches an approver. Clean matches auto-approve. Exceptions are routed to the finance system with the exact reason: not “flagged for review” — the specific policy clause and what it prohibits. The team opens a queue of decisions, not a pile of documents.
- Same vendor, same amount, same date range, different invoice number. That’s not an error — it’s a duplicate designed to get paid twice. The agent catches it at volume.
- Every flag comes with the policy citation. Not “flagged for review” — “Exceeds $500 meal limit per Policy 4.2.1.” Approvers make the call in seconds, not minutes.